21st January 2021

WHO has changed their guidance on the use of PCR tests 

They now state a positive result is not in itself an indication of infection with #COVID19 and that a 2nd test along with a clinical diagnosis is required. THAT THE AMPLIFICATION CYCLES NEEED TO BE LOWERED. CLICK TO SEE WHY THE ONES USED ARE USELESS.

You could have clicked here for full article but it has now been removed...mmmm

CLICK HERETO SEE REPORTS.


PCR TESTS ARE USELESS . ALL  CYCLE THRESHOLDS ARE TOO HIGH. CASES WILL START TO DISAPPEAR WHEN THE CT IS LOWERED  - THE GOVERNMENTS ARE IN CONTROL. WILL THEY LOWER THE CT VALUES A FEW MONTHS AFTER VACCINATIONS TO PROVE VACCINATIONS WORK - OR IS THAT A CONSPIRACY THEORY?
The above was written in January 2021.
In Sept 2021 the following video came out -

 

Screenshot 2021-09-21 at 21.41.36.png

PCR The inventor is Kary Mullis, he won a Nobel prize for Chemistry but the guy who developed the test did it on a computer in Jan last year. His name is Christian Drosten. He sent his testing theory over to China and asked them if it worked. They said yes and the WHO implemented it for the world. He is being taken to court along with the WHO BY REINER FUELLMICH (world renowned lawyer who took on VW over the emissions scandal). Some reports state that Drosten is a fraud as there is some doubt over his final thesis that was/wasn't submitted. 

 "The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load." Something I have known since looking into tests last April. When they turn down the amplification cycles the cases will magically disappear so everything the government has done will be justified. I have been saying for months to my family and friends - don't get a test - it means sweet FA! All those, sanctimonious, virtue signalling, muzzle wearing sheep will wake up when it is too late. Flawed tests have been the reason for lockdowns and people being killed and an economy that is in tatters.

PCR TESTS - how they work and what they mean

The PCR tests work by amplifying anything that it is on a swab.

 

It is important not to go too high with the amplification as it will produce false results, It will pick up a virus strain if the cycles are amplified sufficiently enough.  In some labs they do not go beyond 30 cycles but anything above 35 cycles will pick up nonviable virus fragments of the corona virus.

 

The amplification for the PCR tests being done for CV have been reported as high as 50 cycles some reports quote even higher. The man who invented the PCR test, Nobel Prize winner, Kary Mullis used it for research in to HIV, amongst other things and in his words,

It is ...”A process of making a whole lot of something out of something.

It doesn’t tell you that you were sick.

With PCR, if you do it well you can find almost anything in anybody.

It can be thought of as misuse to claim that it is meaningful.

The measurement is not exact at all."

Scroll down for further revelations about the test

You can clearly see what what it says - "...it is not able to distinguish if a virus is present"

and,  "... a maximum of 40 cycles."

From Principia Scientific International

COVID Test Scam: Cycle Threshold Values Being Deliberately Omitted

Published on October 22, 2020

"One study of 90 positive COVID-19 samples, showed “no positive viral cultures with a Ct greater than 24 or STT [symptom onset to test] greater than 8 days. The odds of a positive culture were decreased by 32% for each unit increase in Ct.”

Another viral culture study of 183 positive samples from 155 patients from the Méditerranée Infection University Hospital Institute in Marseille, France, reported that patients with threshold values at 34 or above did not “excrete infectious viral particles.” The study also showed that infectiousness was greater with Ct values of 13-17, while at a 33 Ct, the culture positivity rate was only 12 percent.

In the most recent study published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, researchers examined 3790 positive COVID-19 samples with known Ct values to find if any could be cultured in vitro. They found that for samples with Ct values of 25 or below, around 70 percent could be cultured, meaning that a higher viral load is correlated with being more contagious."

Click for the full article

Screenshot 2021-01-19 at 19.32.11.png

Lateral Flow Tests

The sensitivity of the lateral flow test for SARS Cov-2 judged by PCR is likely to be between 34% and 64%

Heading 1